The SEC just objected to the "emergency request to provide decisive evidence" filed by Justin W. Keener on April 4, which was beneficial to Ripple. The SEC opposed the motion because they stated: 1) the district court had no jurisdiction over the request because the case had been moved to the Second Circuit; 2) Keener did not file a proper motion for intervention; 3) it was not necessary because, as the SEC attorney pointed out, Ripple had the ability to decide on its own whether the “evidence” involved would contribute to its case For these reasons, the SEC requested Judge Torres to reject the request altogether.
SEC objected to “providing decisive evidence for emergency request”
加密之眼
04-09 03:22
Follow
DisclaimerAll content on this website, hyperlinks, related applications, forums, blog media accounts, and other platforms published by users are sourced from third-party platforms and platform users. BiJieWang makes no warranties of any kind regarding the website and its content. All blockchain-related data and other content on the website are for user learning and research purposes only, and do not constitute investment, legal, or any other professional advice. Any content published by BiJieWang users or other third-party platforms is the sole responsibility of the individual, and has nothing to do with BiJieWang. BiJieWang is not responsible for any losses arising from the use of information on this website. You should use the related data and content with caution and bear all risks associated with it. We strongly recommend that you independently research, review, analyze, and verify the content.
No comments yet